Why News Feels Harder to Sort

Introduction

News feels harder to sort because it now reaches many people inside feeds that do not behave like news products. A public-health warning, a journalist’s investigation, a comedian’s sketch, a campaign post, a paid influencer endorsement, a local rumour and an AI-generated image can all appear in the same scroll, with similar fonts, buttons and emotional force. The problem is not only falsehood. It is category confusion: readers must work out what kind of information they are seeing before they can judge whether to trust it.

This is a historical change in the way public affairs information is packaged. Newspapers, bulletins and news websites used to make source, format and editorial responsibility more visible. Mixed social feeds weaken those signals. Research from the Reuters Institute shows that people are less likely to correctly remember which news brand produced a story when they reached it through social media or search rather than directly, which matters because source memory is one of the basic cues people use when deciding what to trust. [reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk]reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uka news brand if they accessed it directly rather than via search or social.Read more…

How feeds mix information types

The social feed is not organised around journalism’s old boundaries. It is organised around attention. A post can become prominent because it is new, funny, enraging, visually striking, paid for, algorithmically recommended, shared by a friend, stitched by an influencer or attached to a breaking event. None of those signals tells the reader whether the content has been reported, checked, sponsored, advocated, satirised or fabricated.

That is why mixed feeds are different from simply “getting news online”. The Reuters Institute’s 2025 Digital News Report describes a continuing fall in engagement with traditional media sources such as television, print and news websites, alongside growing dependence on social media, video platforms and online aggregators. Overall trust in news was reported as stable at 40%, but the report also highlights the rise of an alternative media ecosystem of YouTubers, podcasters, personalities and influencers competing with professional news organisations for attention. [Ordine Dei Giornalisti]odg.itREUTERS Digital News Report 2025 compressedOrdine Dei GiornalistiReuters Institute Digital News Report 2025June 17, 2025 — Our findings point to a continuing fall in engagement wit…Published: June 17, 2025

The United States offers a clear example of the shift. Pew Research Center’s 2025 social media news fact sheet found that about a fifth or more of American adults regularly get news on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok. Pew’s separate 2024 work showed that even where people do not say they regularly use a platform for news, large majorities still encounter news there in some form. In other words, many people meet public affairs information not because they opened a news app, but because news-like content appeared between other posts. [Pew Research Center]pewresearch.orgsocial media and news fact sheetPew Research CenterSocial Media and News Fact Sheet25 Sept 2025 — Many Americans use social media for news: About a fifth or more regular… [Pew Research Center]pewresearch.orgRead morePew Research CenterHow Americans Get News on TikTok, X, Facebook and…12 Jun 2024 — A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that Facebo…

This matters because intention changes judgement. A person who goes directly to a newspaper, broadcaster or official source is already in a news-checking frame. A person scrolling during a commute or lunch break is often in a mixed frame: entertainment, social belonging, identity, curiosity and distraction all compete with accuracy. The same claim may be processed differently depending on whether it appears as a headline, a friend’s repost, a creator’s monologue, a meme or a dramatic clip.

Trust cues that break down

Trust in news has always depended on cues. Some are explicit: bylines, mastheads, corrections policies, named experts, transparent evidence, links to documents and visible dates. Others are social: reputation, familiarity, professional style and the sense that “this looks like news”. Mixed feeds weaken both sets of cues.

The Reuters Institute’s study of news brand attribution found that people were far more likely to correctly attribute a story to a news brand when they accessed it directly than when they reached it through search or social media. That finding is important because a story can travel far from the context that gave it credibility. A careful investigation may be reduced to a screenshot; a partisan claim may borrow the appearance of a news headline; a post may circulate with the original source cropped away. [reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk]reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uka news brand if they accessed it directly rather than via search or social.Read more…

Brand familiarity can also become a misleading shortcut. In a feed, the visual treatment of posts is partly standardised by the platform: the same avatar size, share button, comment field and engagement metrics surround very different kinds of content. A verified-looking account, high view count or confident delivery can feel like evidence even when it is only a sign of visibility. Conversely, strong journalism from an unfamiliar local or specialist outlet may look less trustworthy than a polished but poorly sourced creator video.

The result is not that people are helpless. It is that the work of sorting has moved from the publisher’s front page to the reader’s moment-by-moment judgement. A useful first question is therefore not “Do I agree?” but “What is this?” The answer may be reported journalism, first-hand testimony, expert explanation, activism, opinion, satire, advertising, propaganda, rumour, synthetic media or some blend of these.

Why influencers complicate news trust

Influencers and creators are not automatically less trustworthy than journalists. Some bring expertise, lived experience, speed, clarity and access to audiences that traditional newsrooms have failed to reach. The trust problem is that creator content often blends personality, commentary, entertainment, community identity and income generation in ways that are not always visible to the viewer.

Pew’s 2025 news influencers fact sheet found that 21% of US adults regularly get news from news influencers on social media. Among those regular consumers, 69% said they mostly get news from influencers because they happen to come across it, rather than because they are actively looking for it. That is a mixed-feed problem: people may be politically informed, persuaded or misled through accidental exposure in entertainment-led spaces. [Pew Research Center]pewresearch.orgnews influencers fact sheetPew Research CenterNews Influencers Fact Sheet4 Nov 2025 — About one-in-five U.S. adults (21%) say they regularly get news from news infl…

UNESCO has raised a related concern about creator practices. Its work on media and information literacy notes that journalists now share the information ecosystem with social media influencers and digital content creators, making training and verification norms more urgent. Reporting on UNESCO’s global study of digital content creators highlighted that many creators rely on personal experience, informal online research or source popularity, and that only around half of surveyed creators clearly disclosed sponsorships. [UNESCO]unesco.orgstrengthens global push media and information literacy mediaUNESCO Strengthens Global Push to Media and…12 May 2025 — With journalists now sharing the information ecosystem with social med…Published: May 2025 [The Guardian]theguardian.comAccording to a survey by Unesco, two-thirds of content creators do not verify the accuracy of their information before sharing, leaving b…

This creates a trust puzzle for readers. A creator may be sincere but under-verified; entertaining but politically persuasive; independent but commercially sponsored; expert in one area but overconfident in another. The old question “Is this a news source?” is no longer enough. Better questions include: What is the creator’s expertise? Are they showing evidence or only reacting to it? Are they correcting errors? Are they being paid, affiliated or rewarded by engagement? Are they separating reporting from opinion?

Advertising and persuasion often look like ordinary posts

Mixed feeds also blur the boundary between information and promotion. Native advertising and influencer marketing are designed to fit the surrounding content rather than interrupt it. That can make advertising feel more like recommendation, commentary or personal testimony.

Research on affiliate marketing disclosures found that only about one tenth of affiliate content on YouTube and Pinterest contained any disclosure, and that users often failed to understand short, non-explanatory disclosure wording. The study is older than the current AI wave, but it remains directly relevant because the basic design problem persists: when commercial content is embedded in ordinary posts, readers may not recognise the persuasion context. [arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

More recent research on native advertising describes a “disclosure dilemma”: ad cues may either blend into rapid-scroll environments unnoticed or stand out enough to trigger disengagement. For news trust, both outcomes matter. If the label is missed, persuasion can be mistaken for independent information. If users become broadly suspicious of everything that looks polished, legitimate journalism can also suffer from the general decline in confidence. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

The practical distinction is simple but often hidden: journalism should be judged by evidence, independence, verification and accountability; advertising should be judged as persuasion, even when it contains true claims. A sponsored climate explainer, a campaign-funded crime post or an influencer’s political product endorsement may contain facts, but the reader still needs to know who benefits from the message being believed or shared.

Synthetic content raises the cost of quick judgement

AI-generated text, images, audio and video add another layer to mixed-feed confusion. Synthetic content does not have to be perfect to damage trust. It only has to be plausible enough to make people hesitate, share too quickly or become cynical about real evidence.

The Reuters Institute’s 2025 report notes that trusted news brands and official sources remain among the places people say they go when checking whether something online is true or false. That suggests professional and institutional sources still have a verification role, even as feeds weaken their direct relationship with audiences. [reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk]reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.ukdnr executivednr executive

Technical provenance systems are one proposed response. The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity describes Content Credentials as a way to help tackle the challenge of trusting media when creation and editing tools are rapidly evolving. These systems can record information about how media was created or altered, but they are not a complete solution: absence of a credential does not prove a post is fake, and presence of a credential still requires careful interpretation. [C2PA Specification]spec.c2pa.orgOpen source on c2pa.org.

The deeper problem is social rather than purely technical. A fake image of a protest, a synthetic local-news clip or an AI voice imitating a public figure may circulate alongside jokes, real footage and partisan commentary. By the time a correction appears, the original post may already have shaped impressions. In mixed feeds, the safest habit is to slow down when a piece of media is both emotionally intense and weakly sourced, especially during breaking events.

Sorting journalism from persuasion

The most useful sorting habit is to classify before trusting. Instead of treating every post as a claim to be believed or rejected, first identify what kind of communication it is. That reduces the risk of judging a campaign post as if it were reporting, or dismissing a verified news story because it resembles the noise around it.

A practical sorting sequence looks like this:

This is not a call to trust only legacy media. It is a call to use different standards for different information types. A local resident’s video may be strong evidence that something happened in a place, but weak evidence for why it happened. A journalist’s article may be strong on verified facts but still open to challenge on framing. An activist thread may explain stakes vividly but select facts strategically. A creator’s explainer may be clear and useful but still need source checking.

Local feeds are especially vulnerable

Local news trust is a useful test case because the cues are often thin. In many areas, local newspapers have shrunk or closed, while Facebook groups, neighbourhood apps and local influencer pages have become major spaces for community information. These spaces can spread useful warnings and mutual aid, but they can also circulate rumours faster than local institutions or journalists can correct them.

Recent UK reporting on Social Market Foundation research described misinformation as more prevalent in “news deserts”, areas with weaker local journalism. The reported analysis of more than 125,000 posts across platforms such as Facebook, X and Nextdoor found misinformation nearly three times more common in those areas, with spikes around elections and recurring false claims involving immigration and local authority messages. [The Guardian]theguardian.comMPs and media advocates warn that unregulated local online groups are eroding trust and influencing public opinion, often more than forma…

The local setting makes mixed-feed sorting harder because trust often comes through social proximity. A post from someone who lives nearby, uses familiar place names or claims to know “what really happened” can feel more credible than a distant institution. But proximity is not the same as verification. Local rumours can be especially persuasive precisely because they feel concrete and personally relevant.

For readers, the key distinction is between local presence and local evidence. A person may be close to an event without knowing the full story. Stronger local information usually includes named authorities, direct documentation, multiple independent witnesses, on-the-record reporting or clear limits on what is known.

Trust should be calibrated, not switched on or off

The danger of mixed feeds is not only gullibility. It is also blanket distrust. When journalism, advertising, activism, entertainment and synthetic material all look similar, some readers respond by assuming that everything is manipulated. That reaction feels protective, but it can make people easier to influence by whichever source best flatters their existing beliefs.

Academic work on changing news use and trust across 46 countries found a small overall decline in trust in news since 2015, but also substantial variation by country and media system. That is a reminder that trust is not a single global mood; it is shaped by institutions, habits, politics, platform use and local media conditions. [OUP Academic]academic.oup.comOpen source on oup.com.

Better critical thinking means calibrated trust. A reader can trust a weather warning for immediate practical purposes, remain cautious about early claims during a violent incident, trust a named expert more within their field than outside it, and treat a viral clip as evidence needing context rather than as a full account. This is more demanding than cynicism, but it is also more useful.

The mixed-feed era rewards people who can hold several judgements at once: this may be real but incomplete; this may be sincere but sponsored; this may be funny but misleading; this may be journalism but still needs comparison; this may be AI-generated but not necessarily false; this may be true but framed to make me angry. News trust now depends less on finding one perfect source and more on building the habit of sorting the feed before the feed sorts the world for you.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why News Feels Harder to Sort. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Thinking, Fast and Slow

By Daniel Kahneman

Helps readers understand the cognitive shortcuts used when scrolling mixed feeds.

See on Amazon

Book

Breaking the Social Media Prism

By Chris Bail

First published 2021. Subjects: Sociology.

See on Amazon

Book

This Is Not Propaganda

By Peter Pomerantsev

First published 2019. Subjects: Sociology, New York Times reviewed, Information society, Truthfulness and falsehood, Propaganda.

See on Amazon

Book

The death of expertise

By Thomas M. Nichols, Sean Pratt

First published 2017. Subjects: Higher Education, Sociology of Knowledge, Theory of Knowledge, Internet, Expertise.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: Thinking, Fast and Slow Breaking the Social Media Prism This Is Not Propaganda

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Shop location

Using USA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

Disobey Mug Anarchist Stuff Vendetta Self Ownership Critical Thinking Question

Search eBay.co.uk: critical thinking mug

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Critical Thinking Mug Homeschool Mom Ayn Rand Question Everything Free Thinker

Search eBay.co.uk: critical thinking mug

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Free Thinker Mug Question Everything Coffee Cup Inspirational Critical Thinking

Search eBay.co.uk: critical thinking mug

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Demand Evidence & Think Critically Mug Can Personalise Critical Thinking Gift

Search eBay.co.uk: critical thinking mug

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
   Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/news-brand-attribution-distributed-environments-do-people-know-where-they-get-their
   Source snippet

   a news brand if they accessed it directly rather than via search or social.Read more...

2. Source: unesco.org
   Title: strengthens global push media and information literacy media
   Link: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-strengthens-global-push-media-and-information-literacy-media
   Source snippet

   UNESCO Strengthens Global Push to Media and...12 May 2025 — With journalists now sharing the information ecosystem with social med...

   Published: May 2025

3. Source: arxiv.org
   Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00620

4. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
   Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380683/

5. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
   Title: dnr executive
   Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/dnr-executive-summary

6. Source: spec.c2pa.org
   Link: https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/explainer/Explainer.html

7. Source: academic.oup.com
   Link: https://academic.oup.com/joc/article/75/1/1/7907139

8. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
   Title: digital news report
   Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025

9. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
   Title: Digital News Report 2025
   Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2025-06/Digital_News-Report_2025.pdf

10. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
    Title: mapping news creators and influencers social and video networks
    Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news-creators-influencers/2025/mapping-news-creators-and-influencers-social-and-video-networks

11. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
    Title: how public checks information it thinks might be wrong
    Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/how-public-checks-information-it-thinks-might-be-wrong

12. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
    Title: digital news report
    Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024

13. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
    Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Brand%2520and%2520trust%2520in%2520a%2520fragmented%2520news%2520environment.pdf

14. Source: reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
    Title: news creators influencers
    Link: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news-creators-influencers/2025

15. Source: unesco.org
    Link: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/shared-frontlines-unesco-bridges-gap-between-journalists-and-content-creators-age-doubt

16. Source: unesdoc.unesco.org
    Link: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark%3A/48223/pf0000395766

17. Source: unesco.org
    Title: world media trends
    Link: https://www.unesco.org/en/world-media-trends

18. Source: pew.org
    Link: https://www.pew.org/en/

19. Source: unesco.at
    Title: 2025 World Trends Freedom of Expression and Media Development
    Link: https://www.unesco.at/fileadmin/user_upload/2025_World_Trends_Freedom_of_Expression_and_Media_Development.pdf

20. Source: c2pa.ai
    Title: for Journalists
    Link: https://c2pa.ai/for-journalists

21. Source: facebook.com
    Title: the 2025 digital news report is here and it signals major shifts in how people
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/GlobalInvestigativeJournalismNetwork/posts/-the-2025-digital-news-report-is-here-and-it-signals-major-shifts-in-how-people-/1119966693505764/

22. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/pewresearch/posts/for-the-first-time-pew-research-center-went-deeper-into-comparing-teens-experien/1327827459213311/

23. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/ofcom/photos/-how-do-you-get-your-newsour-latest-research-shows-that-70-of-uk-adults-now-get-/1188018723357100/

24. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/671022767060782/posts/1935367443959635/

25. Source: instagram.com
    Title: DLABNUZow Gb
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DLABNUZowGb/?hl=en

26. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd4tnA7osX4

27. Source: youtube.com
    Title: How algorithms shape what you see on social media
    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWt_IL3JViY
    Source snippet

    Algorithms are breaking how we think...

28. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Algorithms are breaking how we think
    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEJpZjg8GuA
    Source snippet

    Breaking the News: Trust in the Age of Digital Media...

29. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Breaking the News: Trust in the Age of Digital Media
    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S6MgdPFCYI
    Source snippet

    The danger of social media algorithms | Isaiah Burks | TEDxGeorgiaCollege...

30. Source: youtube.com
    Title: The danger of social media algorithms | Isaiah Burks | TEDx Georgia College
    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxGHJLt4O0E
    Source snippet

    Changing the hive mind -- How social media manipulation affects everything: Tim Weninger at TEDxUND...

31. Source: youtube.com
    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVsz5xFd3qU
    Source snippet

    Reuters Institute Digital News Report social media feeds news trust India's Changing News Consumption Habits - 2023 Digital News Report E...

32. Source: odg.it
    Title: REUTERS Digital News Report 2025 compressed
    Link: https://www.odg.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/REUTERS-Digital_News-Report_2025_compressed.pdf
    Source snippet

    Ordine Dei GiornalistiReuters Institute Digital News Report 2025June 17, 2025 — Our findings point to a continuing fall in engagement wit...

    Published: June 17, 2025

33. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: social media and news fact sheet
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/
    Source snippet

    Pew Research CenterSocial Media and News Fact Sheet25 Sept 2025 — Many Americans use social media for news: About a fifth or more regular...

34. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: Read more
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/06/12/how-americans-get-news-on-tiktok-x-facebook-and-instagram/
    Source snippet

    Pew Research CenterHow Americans Get News on TikTok, X, Facebook and...12 Jun 2024 — A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that Facebo...

35. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: news influencers fact sheet
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news-influencers-fact-sheet/
    Source snippet

    Pew Research CenterNews Influencers Fact Sheet4 Nov 2025 — About one-in-five U.S. adults (21%) say they regularly get news from news infl...

36. Source: theguardian.com
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/nov/26/online-influencers-need-urgent-fact-checking-training-warns-unesco
    Source snippet

    According to a survey by Unesco, two-thirds of content creators do not verify the accuracy of their information before sharing, leaving b...

37. Source: theguardian.com
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jun/08/social-media-groups-fuel-misinfomation-uk-news-deserts-report
    Source snippet

    MPs and media advocates warn that unregulated local online groups are eroding trust and influencing public opinion, often more than forma...

38. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: americans social media use
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/01/31/americans-social-media-use/

39. Source: pewresearch.org
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/platforms-services/social-media/youtube/

40. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: social media
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/platforms-services/social-media/

41. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: social media
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/

42. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: teens social media and technology 2024
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/12/12/teens-social-media-and-technology-2024/

43. Source: pewresearch.org
    Title: young adults and the future of news
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2025/12/03/young-adults-and-the-future-of-news/

44. Source: pewresearch.org
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/

45. Source: pewresearch.org
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/platforms-services/social-media/instagram/

46. Source: pewresearch.org
    Link: https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/platforms-services/social-media/tiktok/

47. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8869166/

48. Source: europeanjournalists.org
    Link: https://europeanjournalists.org/blog/2024/12/06/unesco-report-highlights-urgent-need-for-media-literacy-training-for-digital-content-creators-who-report-the-news/

49. Source: linkedin.com
    Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pew-research-center_teens-social-media-and-technology-2024pdf-activity-7273382762210856963-mKMU

50. Source: GOV.UK
    Title: www.gov.uk News Consumption Survey
    Link: https://www.gov.uk/[government/statistics

51. Source: GOV.UK
    Title: value of bbc news
    Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/value-of-bbc-news/value-of-bbc-news

52. Source: GOV.UK
    Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements/news-consumption-survey-teens-data–3

Additional References

1. Source: researchgate.net
   Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394587897_Blending_in_or_standing_out_The_disclosure_dilemma_of_ad_cues_of_social_media_native_advertising

2. Source: ofcom.org.uk
   Link: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/attitudes-to-news

3. Source: dco.org
   Link: https://dco.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/From-Social-Media-to-Truth-Countering-Misinformation-for-a-Thriving-Digital-Economy.pdf

4. Source: researchgate.net
   Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327942993_News_brand_attribution_in_distributed_environments_Do_people_know_where_they_get_their_news

5. Source: ofcom.org.uk
   Link: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-adults/passive-social-media-use-ai-companionship-and-online-side-hustles-uk-adults-media-and-online-lives-revealed

6. Source: linkedin.com
   Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/charleshemann_americans-social-media-use-2025-activity-7401672506061086720-NhRl

7. Source: informs.org
   Link: https://www.informs.org/News-Room/INFORMS-Releases/News-Releases/Researchers-Find-that-Native-Advertising-Builds-Credibility-Not-Perceived-as-Tricking-Visitors

8. Source: cidob.org
   Link: https://www.cidob.org/sites/default/files/2025-10/REGROUP%20focus%20paper%20no.%208.pdf

9. Source: retresco.de
   Link: https://www.retresco.de/en/encyclopedia/trusted-ai/

10. Source: linkedin.com
    Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ofcom_our-research-shows-that-70-of-uk-adults-activity-7360623905922818049-MXgL